by Recovery Soon » Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:12 pm
Sylvia,
Yes, I'm a classic sugar, water rat.
To your point, I have given plenty of time where I had no anticipation whatsoever of anything, yet like clockwork this post reaction has persisted. It is only after such a long time that I have come to this conclusion, not because I have been protesting or anticipating or obsessing/fearing the whole way through.
The sugar rat comparison is very useful here. The reason I point to the time delay is because it onsets so suddenly after a day and a half. So, yes, there is likely a conditioned response, but to what? If it was to the exertion itself, should it not occur shortly afterwards? Or if it is the fear, then should that not trigger a reaction shortly afterwards? But such a sudden onset, occurring so predictably, so long after the incident leads me to believe that the conditioned response is to something other than exertion or fear. It would appear to me to be connected to whatever the body releases a day and a half after exercise. The reason this is important is because I don't think fear is part of that equation. I certainly don't feel afraid. I wasn't thinking after the exercise "Oh God, here comes the reaction!" I just exercise, go about my life, and BAM.
Yes, It is frustrating this long into the program. I can't stop, stop, stop forever, and regularly meditate, without more of a reward system in place to sustain this effort (if we're going to stick with the Pavlovian model).
Exercise may be vain to you. But to me its a clear marker of where one is on the road of recovery. If I was improving on any objective measure, that would be it. As CFS since 1998 pointed out, no bio-markers have changed. And my day to day symptoms fluctuate as they always have. So exercise and sleep are as good a recovery barometer as I can think of.
To your point about agreeing to buy in fully or move on, I understand where you're coming from. But I feel most true continuing the program with faith, while also maintaining my integrity/honesty about what I am experiencing and seeing from others. I don't want to be faithless or a fool. I want to be honest and call out what I see as inconsistencies and/or incongruent statement from Gupta and/or anyone else. Not to be right, but to be real.
As far as there not being any recoveries if the theory isn't true- I think CFS since 1998 was right regarding the placebo effect. There's no denying this can be giving us our improvements (of which mine have plateaued for many, many months).
Yet, at the same time I understand how Sarno/TMS theories rely solely on faith to heal what is thought to be an emotional cause. And to your point specifically, how it might be more useful to just drop the dialogue and go with wherever it takes me as the best path forward.
Believe me, I've done that for a long time.